In your own words (no more than 3000) explain the Big Bang Theory. Some things you may want to focus on are:
What are the main influencing factors?
Estimated age of the universe?
Rate of expansion...
You will be assessed in some key areas and these are highlighted in the rubric attached to the assessment.
Turn in date is highlighted in the calendar and should you have andy questions please post your message in the discussion forum.Please refer to this document before stating this assignment. It can be access by CLICKING HERE....
149886000006/30/201711:00pm
Rubric
true
123
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClear Perspective43415_2949
threshold:
4.0 pts
4to >3.0 Pts
Exceeds Standards: Develops detailed and convincing argument that establishes a clear, nuanced perspective. (Structurally for example: "I am for X because Y or with the condition Z.")
blank
3to >2.0 Pts
Meets Standards: Develops a fairly convincing argument with sufficient information to establish a perspective but is not conditional or well thought out.ations
15_5454
2to >1.0 Pts
Almost Meets Standards: Attempts to develop a convincing argument although details are lacking and perspective may be unclear.
15_740
1to >0 Pts
Not Yet: Does not seem to attempt to develop a convincing argument and details are lacking. Perspective is unclear.
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeEngaging43715_1621
threshold:
4.0 pts
4to >3.0 Pts
Exceeds Standards: The writing effectively uses language, style and tone appropriate to the genre, medium and audience and engages the reader through things like attention getting introductions, word choice, images, personal stories (whatever the teacher would like to focus on).
15_487
3to >2.0 Pts
Meets Standards: Most of writing effectively uses language, style and tone appropriate to the genre, medium and audience and engages the reader through things like attention getting introductions, word choice, images, personal stories (whatever the teacher would like to focus on)
15_6863
2to >1.0 Pts
Almost Meets Standards: While there are some sections or words that try to engage the reader, the language, style or tone need more work to engage the reader and are not appropriate to the genre, medium and audience.
15_1303
1to >0 Pts
Not Yet: The language, style and tone of the work make little attempt to engage the reader.
15_3251
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeEvidence43915_3865
threshold:
4.0 pts
4to >3.0 Pts
Exceeds Standards: Opinions and reasoning are supported with strong, compelling evidence that is factual and philosophical and is from well established or reputiable sources that make the evidence credible.
15_1800
3to >2.0 Pts
Meets Standards: Evidence supports reasoning and opinion and it may be factual (i.e., the mosque is two blocks away and it isn't a mosque) and philosophical (its about freedom).
15_5204
2to >1.0 Pts
Almost Meets Standards: Some evidence may be present to support the resoning but other evidence is irrelevant. There may be a mismatch between reason and the types of evidence.
15_6377
1to >0 Pts
Not Yet: Little evidence is present or evidence is based purely on feelings or is off topic--anecdotal reportage.
15_3999
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOpposing Arguments43615_1457
threshold:
4.0 pts
4to >3.0 Pts
Exceeds Standards: Engages one or many targeted and relevant competing arguments by elaborating and picking apart the opponent's argument to bolster or defend the writer's own argument.
15_5528
3to >2.0 Pts
Meets Standards: Engages one or many competing arguments by elaborating or picking apart the argument to bolster or defend the writer's own argument.
15_7218
2to >1.0 Pts
Almost Meets Standards: Acknowledges a competing argument, but does not elaborate on it or pick it apart in any way. Ex: "My opponents say x, I say
15_9940
1to >0 Pts
Not Yet: No attempt is made to acknowledge a competing argument
15_4298
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStrong Reasons43815_558
threshold:
4.0 pts
4to >3.0 Pts
Exceeds Standards: Provides strong, distinct reasons that support the writer’s opinion and develop the argument, e.g., the meaning is connected directly to the perspective and the reasons are clearly different from each other.) Feelings or personal peferences may be present but don’t stand alone.
15_6372
3to >2.0 Pts
Meets Standards: Provides reasons that support the writer’s opinion and develop the argument--may not be thoroughly connected to the perspective or may be overlapping. Feelings or personal peferences may be present but don’t stand alone.
15_6082
2to >1.0 Pts
Almost Meets Standards: Few reasons are evident; there needs to be more support and development of the writer’s argument--reasons are weakly connected to the perspective, largely overlap and/or rely solely on feelings and personal preferences.
15_9333
1to >0 Pts
Not Yet: No or only a vague reasons are provided but there needs to be more support and development of the reader’s argument.
15_7861
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
Find rubric